Talk:Sailor Moon SuperS - (Kaiteiban) Yume Senshi - Ai - Eien ni... Saturn Fukkatsu Hen

From WikiMoon
Jump to: navigation, search

I've just translated the title fr the romaji :P - is it the same as the original Jap. one? --210 03:38, 13 January 2007 (MST)

Answering myself: I've checked that & fixed my translation accordingly. --210 06:12, 2 March 2008 (MST)

Do we need to move the article to "Sailor Moon SuperS - (Kaiteiban) Yume Senshi - Ai - Eien ni... Saturn Fukkatsu Hen!" ? Kerochan no Miko 01:34, 2 March 2008 (MST)

Guess so. --210 06:12, 2 March 2008 (MST)

I don't see an exclamation point in the title on the official site - anyone know where it came from? Kerochan no Miko 16:42, 24 February 2012 (MST)

It's not in the video itself, either. Propose that the article be moved to Sailor Moon SuperS - (Kaiteiban) Yume Senshi - Ai - Eien ni... Saturn Fukkatsu Hen accordingly. Kerochan no Miko 17:03, 24 February 2012 (MST)


The summary was done by me, with no help from any third party.--Sailorsimon 01:21, 28 February 2012 (MST)


1) Queen Serenity was linked twice.

2) Tuxedo Mask doesn't talk about the mirror reflection thing in the Kaiteiban.

Why would you remove those edits without reasons? I understand that editing is the point of a wiki, but I would really appreciate being told what's wrong with my edits when they are removed. --Sailorsimon 22:03, 4 March 2012 (MST)

...I honestly have no idea. I must have accidentally hit the "rollback" link instead of "mark as patrolled" when I was patrolling edits this morning. Sorry about that. Kerochan no Miko 22:26, 4 March 2012 (MST)
Oh, wait, I see it. I was removing the link to the "Homosexuality in Sailor Moon" article and it rolled back both edits instead. Kerochan no Miko 22:33, 4 March 2012 (MST)
Oh, okay I see... about that, what can't this be linked, isn't Fisheye one of the few canon homosexual characters? --Sailorsimon 22:44, 4 March 2012 (MST)
It's not that Fisheye isn't a homosexual character, it was the place where it was linked that I objected to. Kerochan no Miko 22:51, 4 March 2012 (MST)
You're right. I think it should probably stay in character articles. --Sailorsimon 22:57, 4 March 2012 (MST)
...that's not what I said at all. It's just that where it was linked it felt unnaturally thrown in just for the sake of being linked, not because that was appropriate to the article in question. Kerochan no Miko 23:13, 4 March 2012 (MST)
I fixed my previous comment, I meant "I think that...", I didn't mean to say that that was what you said. Oh okay, what I meant was just that unless referring directly to a character's orientation or same-sex relationship, that linked would pretty much feel out of place; and now that I've thought about it, I can't see where it would be relevant to address a specific character's orientation or same-sex relationship except in their character page... --Sailorsimon 00:17, 5 March 2012 (MST)
When you change your previous comment then it makes my comment look ridiculous, thank you very much. 9_9
And if that's your opinion then that's your opinion. Kerochan no Miko 07:36, 5 March 2012 (MST)