WikiMoonWeb Talk:Fandom

From WikiMoon
Revision as of 10:13, 7 August 2018 by Kerochan no Miko (talk | contribs)
(diff) ←Older revision | view current revision (diff) | Newer revision→ (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

I hope those descriptions work all right, I wasn't really sure what to put. I figure my site is more geared towards otaku senshi anyway and the otaku senshi wiki page itself could reference links that fit that category. What are the requirements to list a site? I am familiar with quite a few nice otaku senshi based sites.--Sakky 16:25, 2 July 2007 (MST)

If you think they're the good ones of the category, just list them! Should the editors think they're inappropriate, they'd delete them. --210 18:22, 2 July 2007 (MST)

Should their be a category for directory sites such as Deep Submerge or would that be redundant (linking to a links site)?--Sakky 14:59, 29 July 2007 (MST)

Now that you've got the 2nd links site (the 1st one being here (currently the 5th item)), as per the discussion here, I think it's time to create a separate category on this page. --210 18:41, 29 July 2007 (MST)

I added some more Otaku Senshi sites that I frequent. My criteria for adding these sites was that they were active sites, on a domain (or at least, not plastered with ads), had decent layouts (more or less ^^), contained at least the beginning of an actual fan fiction, and had no broken links, images, etc. I also put the list in alphabetical order and tried to include concise but not too repetitive descriptions. Edit as needed.  :3 --Sakky 16:05, 26 September 2007 (MST)

Added a fandub section. I'm surprised there wasn't one there before. Feel free to add any fandubs that have up to date websites and such~ --Inariko 9:45, 29 November 2007 (EST)

Quite a few links, sadly, seem to be down or inactive over half a decade or so. Would it be okay if I put archives or mirrors for those on the WikiMoonWeb:Archives page? -Sailor-minako-chan (talk) 07:52, 7 August 2018 (EDT)

Not unless those sites were in some way prominent or significant to the fandom, as stated on the Archive page. Kerochan no Miko (talk) 08:36, 7 August 2018 (EDT)
Any guiding criteria? -Sailor-minako-chan (talk) 09:15, 7 August 2018 (EDT)
....prominence in the fandom...?
It should be fairly obvious that a website was big enough to have an article about it. If there's doubt, then it probably shouldn't. Note that there are currently only two websites with articles, which means that it really needs to be significant to have one. Kerochan no Miko (talk) 10:13, 7 August 2018 (EDT)