Talk:Galactica Tsunami

From WikiMoon
Jump to: navigation, search

Um...Galactica Tsunami was a real attack, at least in the manga... Kerochan no Miko 21:42, 21 July 2006 (MST)

Arguably in the anime too. The way it was animated suggested that it wasn't totally ineffectual, although it was a tad unconventional to say the least. dooky 02:34, 22 July 2006 (MST)
maybe it wasn't that offensive, just wreaking havoc... and still it made the inners use their powers against it o_O--StarFighter 03:01, 22 July 2006 (MST)

Are you sure about Galactica Tsunami being an attack using her hair? It seems like she is creating a whirlpool of energy (maybe water??) for me. The attack is countered by Jupiter and Mercury, and then she sends her hair against them without saying a word. --Silver 14:39, 20 August 2009 (MST)

If you look at it, though, her hair is fading into the "whirlpool" surrounding her when she calls out the attack. From the way the panels are drawn it looks completely plausible to me that Jupiter and Mercury only managed to deflect it for a short time before being caught up, not like it's a separate attack. Kerochan no Miko 15:11, 20 August 2009 (MST)
Speculation! ^^ Hmm, actually it seems more like Jupiter and Mercury are canceling an energy attack (for me), but you're right, it really seems like her hair grows and moves as she says "Galactica Tsunami" and waves her hands, so I suppose your right... --Silver 18:08, 20 August 2009 (MST)
With the way her hair is part of it, and the way her hair is continually drawn like it's moving around, I'd say it makes sense. And if you look at the panel with Mercury and Jupiter it looks like they're setting up a dome/circular barrier around themselves against the attack, which subsequently fails and they get caught. At least, that's what it looks like to me. It's a bit less "speculation" and more "interpretation" here... Kerochan no Miko 20:22, 20 August 2009 (MST)
Just joking. I know is impossible to know exactly what are they doing when they performs attacks in the manga (specially one-panel attacks). But now that I'm checking the act it's very likely that it is the way you're interpretating it. --Silver 06:58, 21 August 2009 (MST)