Talk:Usagi's Everlasting Wish! A New Reincarnation

From WikiMoon
Jump to: navigation, search

Italian Dub[edit]

The Italian dub did not feature any music during the battle with Queen Beryl. Above is a TV rip of the episode. --Umino 3:25, 29 August 2010 (MST)

Spanish Trivia[edit]

I added some trivia from the Spanish dub. I have more trivia data like that for other episodes, but I'd like to know if that info is allowed or not, because maybe it's not general enought. E.Knight 10-september-09, 21:54.

You can add trivia about dubs other than the Japanese and the English ones, since we have a lot of trivia notes about changes in the voice cast and remarkable differences in other dubs on a lot of episode summaries. --Silver 13:34, 10 September 2009 (MST)
Good, thank you very much for make it clear :) E.Knight 11-september-09, 00:22 (GTM+1).
I would prefer that information on the foreign-language dubs be kept to more significant details. In other words, information about the Spanish dub actress for, say, Usagi I don't mind, but not the minor characters. Kerochan no Miko 07:19, 12 September 2009 (MST)
Yes, I sort of meant that. --Silver 07:23, 12 September 2009 (MST)


The French and Hungarian dubs used an out of synch version of "Moonlight Densetsu."
What does this mean? In other words, what's an "out of sync version" of a song? Kerochan no Miko 23:38, 24 December 2010 (MST)

Since nobody explained it and it doesn't make sense as it is, I removed that line. Kerochan no Miko 02:59, 8 January 2011 (MST)

Keiko Han trivia[edit]

That's not her only credit for Beryl, there's another one in Make up! Sailor Senshi. If that trivia bit isn't referring specifically to the TV series, maybe it's better to say "first", then mention the second instance? --YnK 14:12, 4 October 2011 (MST)


Why was this section [1] reverted? I thought this website was suppose to include as much information about a given topic as possible. I am puzzled now about this move.--ZagrebFan (talk) 04:33, 14 June 2016 (MST)

That information is irrelevant to this article. This article is about the episode, not about what some random websites thought about it. Kerochan no Miko (talk) 07:19, 14 June 2016 (MST)
How can information about an episode be irrelevant to an article about that episode? This brief response makes no sense to me. Why not expand an article into a truly rich, featured article? For instance, only a handful of Sailor Moon episodes were included into the Animage list. I think that should be mentioned. For me, this is highly relevant. I'm sorry, but your policy is counterproductive. It just narrows an article down to a perpetual state of a stub.--ZagrebFan (talk) 11:13, 14 June 2016 (MST)
You can feel it's necessary all that you want, but the opinions of random people on a topic is not and has never been considered at all important to include in any articles on this wiki. This particular episode is just fine as it is and I'm baffled as to why you consider it's a stub simply because we don't include opinion pieces.
If you want to link to review blogs, that's what the Wikimoon Web section is for. Please review the policies of this wiki and follow them and the existing article templates in the future. Kerochan no Miko (talk) 11:36, 14 June 2016 (MST)
1) Where can I find the link for Wikimoon policies? 2) How can I start a vote to appeal those rules and change them? Because, sincerely, I think if this is all what this website is about, then it is a very formal, lifeless index.--ZagrebFan (talk) 05:55, 15 June 2016 (MST)
1) Rules and Style guidelines
2) On this matter, you can't. Personal opinions are not a part of articles, even if they're other peoples' personal opinions that you gathered from various websites. If you disagree, feel free to form your own wiki in which you can put all the random opinions you like; this wiki is simply not about that. Kerochan no Miko (talk) 07:38, 15 June 2016 (MST)
Well, we have included fan opinions of characters before as long as they were well documented; for example, how Mercury was the most popular Senshi in Japan, or the fact that a section of the Western fandom dislikes Chibiusa. I don't know about websites like (barely heard of it myself, though that's not necessarily a good indicator in my case) but that Animage magazine sounds like a legit reference source to me. Silver (talk) 08:33, 15 June 2016 (MST)
Those examples are very rare and not the same as this situation. With regard to adding an entire "reception" or "fan opinion" section on articles, it will not happen. Period. Kerochan no Miko (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2016 (MST)
Nah, an entire reception section based on fan opinions would inevitably clash with our policies. But documented facts like notes about the episodes featured in Animage that you added are adequate and enough for me. Silver (talk) 22:26, 15 June 2016 (MST)
Yeah, you were right about Animage being a legit thing, so I did some research on it. Facts are okay. Bloggers' opinions are another matter. Kerochan no Miko (talk) 15:01, 16 June 2016 (MST)