Difference between revisions of "Talk:Manami"

From WikiMoon
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
:Okay, I just didn't think it was ''that'' speculative. --[[User:GracieLizzie|GracieLizzie]] 04:55, 20 October 2006 (MST)
 
:Okay, I just didn't think it was ''that'' speculative. --[[User:GracieLizzie|GracieLizzie]] 04:55, 20 October 2006 (MST)
 
::It's not a big leap, you're right, and it's a reasonable guess, but it's the kind of trivia I complained about last week or the week before at another talk page where it reads like, "Here is something user x thought of." Trivia, to me at least, ought to be based more on facts or production notes. Stuff like Mitsuishi Kotono not voicing episodes 45-51. Often there's a thin line between some trivia and nit-picking but we'd have to move on a case-by-case basis.--[[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] 07:56, 20 October 2006 (MST)
 
::It's not a big leap, you're right, and it's a reasonable guess, but it's the kind of trivia I complained about last week or the week before at another talk page where it reads like, "Here is something user x thought of." Trivia, to me at least, ought to be based more on facts or production notes. Stuff like Mitsuishi Kotono not voicing episodes 45-51. Often there's a thin line between some trivia and nit-picking but we'd have to move on a case-by-case basis.--[[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] 07:56, 20 October 2006 (MST)
 +
:::It might be a reasonable guess, but there's no indication whatsoever that Look Who's Talking was an influence or not, and therefore it's speculation. While I don't think that we need a reference for any trivia bit whatsoever, I really think there needs to be some basis in actual fact for trivia notes like that one. [[User:Kerochan no Miko|Kerochan no Miko]] 20:51, 20 October 2006 (MST)

Revision as of 22:51, 20 October 2006

That's right, this isn't wikipedia. Let's keep the speculation to a minimum.--WikiSysop 04:05, 20 October 2006 (MST)

Okay, I just didn't think it was that speculative. --GracieLizzie 04:55, 20 October 2006 (MST)
It's not a big leap, you're right, and it's a reasonable guess, but it's the kind of trivia I complained about last week or the week before at another talk page where it reads like, "Here is something user x thought of." Trivia, to me at least, ought to be based more on facts or production notes. Stuff like Mitsuishi Kotono not voicing episodes 45-51. Often there's a thin line between some trivia and nit-picking but we'd have to move on a case-by-case basis.--WikiSysop 07:56, 20 October 2006 (MST)
It might be a reasonable guess, but there's no indication whatsoever that Look Who's Talking was an influence or not, and therefore it's speculation. While I don't think that we need a reference for any trivia bit whatsoever, I really think there needs to be some basis in actual fact for trivia notes like that one. Kerochan no Miko 20:51, 20 October 2006 (MST)